Technology In The Workplace

Technology in the WorkplacePractiti adeptrs and academics often assume that investments in engine room will lead to productivity improvements . While the literature provides some examples of carrying out improvements resulting from adoption of different technologies , there is little evidence demonstrating specific generalizable factors that contribute to these improvements Furthermore , investment in applied science does not guarantee effective capital punishment . The importance of acquaintance communion and the efficiency to tap into an organization s vast source of creative intellect have been acknowledged as perhaps the greatest strategic competency an organization can reach (Davenport 1999 Pan et al . 1999 . By enabling associates to share their ideas , expertise and wisdom , problems can be more easily lick , processes improved , and productivity increased . As business environments break down more turbulent and technologies become increasingly dynamic , the footfall of change and competitive pressures spiral more steeply upward . As this paces continues , organizations require technologies , capabilities and a culture that changes them to keep up with these changes (Senge 1997Furthermore , in an era that is becoming predominantly digital , the ability to share knowledge is becoming easier , cheaper and more widely recognized . Many organizations recognize that cooperative technologies supported by distributed electronic networks , can reduce barriers to parley and facilitate knowledge manduction within the organization (Ciborra et al , 1996 . Collaborative technologies can enable people in distributed environments to work together seamlessly irrespective of attitude , time or functional area . By share a common goal in a networked environment , virtual teams can create synergistic relationships and quality production via collaborative knowledge communion . In addition , the communication patterns that develop in electronic collaborative environments are evenly applicable to people sharing knowledge in the homogeneous building or even the same room as those who are divided by continents (Barker et al , 1998While causal relationships amid knowledge sharing and specific quantifiable performance improvements to achieve competitive advantages have been scarce , researchers have qualitatively authenticated some organizational performance improvements .

For example , the adoption of one particular collaborative technology (Lotus Notes ) to facilitate knowledge sharing increased productivity and efficiency in a parcel company by creating a knowledge repository which prevented duplication of research efforts (Orlikowski , 1996 . The research literature acknowledges this relationship while pursuit to validate it with additional empirical studies . While most research in knowledge management and collaborative technologies has foc handlingd on large organizations , few studies have examined its impact on smallish businesses In addition , few studies have explored the specific victor factors that contribute to the adoption and diffusion of technologies that facilitate knowledge sharing and resulting performance improvementsIn addition , researchers in the field of performance standard and collaborative technologies have found tentative relationships between performance improvement and knowledge sharing using different collaborative technologies in different contexts . However , organizations often introduce virgin technologies using a forced adoption approach without fully understanding the specific factors required for their continued and effective use . This represents a prerequisite requirement if the technology is to be use to fulfill the goals for which it was intendedThe importance of culture in the adoption and implementation was exemplified by the...If you want to get a full essay, order of battle it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper