Analysis of the Article: “The New Psychology of Leadership” Essay

Analysis of the Article The New Psychology of Leadership Scientific American Mind Journal, August 2007 The article by Stephen D. Reicher tells us about how the definition of Leaders has been changed over time, and how it change to suit todays lodge (Reicher, Platow and Haslam). It tells about how this effective loss leadership contradicted the conventional nonion of what a leader should be, how a leader should act. It gave the September 11 barrage fire, where President George W. Bush has stepped up to give us a clear definition of what todays leaders ar like. Bush was merely an example, and that thither are other aspects that would give a meaning to the leaders of today, redefining the belief that it only takes willingness and vitrine to change by reversal a successful leader. The early point that was stressed, and that was manifested by President Bush during the 9/11 bombing was that leaders have been remodeled by the society today. It is not only willingness and character t hat the people need. Todays leaders should also be able to act or be like them, be bingle with the people. Through that, there will be unity and with a unified following, the leader can whence mobilize these people to achieve the changes, as for the time of the bombing, was the call for America to act as unity against terrorism. In the article, there are several changes that have been shown when it comes to a characteristic that a leader should possess. The first of these changes was about charisma, evolving to a consensus. The notion about how leaders should possess charisma in order to bump off success have been slowly shadowed by the fact that charismatic leaders are not effective leaders if they wont be able to get something going. It was then replaced by how well a leader adapts to his situation, and how he is able to lead people, which defines him as a leader. He should not be delimitate as how many people he can convince, instead he should be defined by how many people h e was able to mobilize and bring out changes with his leadership. Another defining character that an effective leader should possess is to be able to blend in with the crowd, the very people he is leading and supervising. He should be one of the gang, and not to be seen as the high-and-mighty sovereign normal of the land. This is to gain the confidence and the respect of the people. If he is able to be seen as someone like them or someone who understands them, then the leader would definitely have their trusts and be able to mobilize these people toward the goals and objectives of the leaders which are also for the peoples interests. The leader should also be fair with his constituents or to those who are in lower positions from them. This is to maintain the trust and the positive outlook from these people, for them to think that these leaders are not taking advantage of their position, or that these leaders do not deserve their position at all. It is through with(predicate) their followers that the leader will be able to determine what to do, which is usually dependent on how the pigeonholing thinks. Fairness can be observed by effective leaders in resolving problems mingled with members, wherein there should be no favoritism shown. The leader should also be able to verbalize their leadership, cosmos able to wield words and deliver them correctly to the people. This is one way of strengthening his command and create the respect of his followers, so that they can be effectively mobilized by the leaders. This article is a useful character reference of information on how a person can be an effective leader. This also updates us of how the society today defines an effective leader. This is because an effective leader doesnt have a constant or concrete definition, of what should possess to become an effective leader. It still lies on his constituents, in his followers, that would define him on how a leader should be. This is because a leader is also a serva nt, and that is why a leader also has to be of gain to others, which are the general public.Reicher, Stephen D., Michael J. Platow, and S. Alexander Haslam. The New Psychology of Leadership. 2007. Scientific American Mind. August 9 2007. .