The pervasive record of friendship and its effects have made this topic of wide interest to individuals in a variety of disciplines. (Bukowski, 1996)
acquaintance is a complex concept defined by the individual. Many psychologists and sociologists, among other(a) fields of research, have sought to explore the nature of friendship, peculiarly in children. To understand how bonds are created, what the expectations of a friend are and how these expectations develop over time, researchers have devised methods they believe to be the or so comprehensive approach to explore this topic. This essay concentrates on unspoilt two of the methods used and through examining each approach testament show the advantages, disadvantages, virtues and inadequacies of each.
Bigelow & La Gaipa were two of the first psychologists to study childrens friendships. Their aim was to study the differences in childrens understanding of friendship at various spirit levels of development, and then develop a copy to apply to a wider population. The method they used to do this was quite an extraordinary.
They asked groups of upper-lower-class and lower-middle-class children aged between six and fourteen who lived in the Canadian town of Windsor, Ontario to write an essay closely their best friend of the same sex. A total of 480 essays were undisturbed and the content of each was analysed against a predetermined list of 21 Friendship Expectations devised by the duo at the beginning of the study.
Dimensions were elect to encompass various levels of abstraction as in cognitive and moral judgment developmental theory. (Bigalow & La Gaipa, 1975)
The development of Friendship Expectations was summarised by Bigelow and La Gaipa as a three stage model. The first stage consisted of physical attributes, such as approach (geographical closeness) and...If you want to get a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com
If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper
No comments:
Post a Comment