Comparative Culture

History shows that the vital collaboration of pietism and husbandry has been the natural condition of human society from the beginning , and that even the faiths which prove to escape from life to the eternal cessation of Nirvana be driven in spite of themselves to clothe themselves in cultural forms . Every negate of cultures is seen as a conflict of different spiritual principles , in other words a conflict of religions and it usually becomes such in fact since the differences of culture and companionable tradition tend to ally themselves with differences of religious doctrine (Fred 2004 . If we count at the functions that religion allegedly performs for society , two claims are most commonly acknowledged , and accepted , in the literary works : its integrated function and its legitimating function . Both functions are conceived as important indicators of religion s relevance to culture of society . To render the question of the relationship between religion and politics it is necessity to understand the socio-cultural , virtuous , and religious frameworks within which the modern public operatesClearly , the roots of the integrative force of civil religion in the United States and Egypt can be traced back to the very contemporaries of the concept itself . When dealing with the role of religion in culture in the United States and Egypt , most authors fail to acknowledge that the Durkheimian precedent is only i way of conceptualizing social integration certify suggests that there are other possible manifestations of integration . In fact , to understand this notions in all their complexity we moldiness make some key distinctions regarding its meaning . First , iodine must be careful to distinguish between impulsive integration (the Durkheimian approach ) and forced integration (the Rousseauan one , which is more likely to produce conflict and division . In the latter case , an integrative internal civic credit is to be decreed and aroused from the top down as an substitute source of civic virtue .

It follows that integration may be functional for society , but quite dysfunctional for the individualistic (under military rule or a dictatorship , for exampleEven a superficial review of the literature reveals that whereas the definitional issue was the subject of het up(p) polarization , a high degree of consensus has existed regarding religion s integrative role in the United States . Most authors share the stem that religion is an important factor in nation construction (Douglas 1997 . It upholds the moral of society , and allegedly provides Americans with a sense of subject field identity and national solidarity , uniting them in a moral communityIts essential function is to build , affirm , and lionise a common national heritage . Analysts also agree that religion is a kind of bridge between citizen and nation . As such , it is conceived as a mobilizing force towards the attainment of national aspirations . In short , American religion is said to promote national unity , sustain commitment towards national goals , and celebrate the American culture and way of life Simply roll , there is a widespread belief that a religion , Americanism imparts a moral and religious significance to the entire...If you want to propose a full essay, order it on our website: Ordercustompaper.com

If you want to get a full essay, wisit our page: write my paper